Sunday, 16 December 2012
Hobbit ... it was okay.
I liked it and
ate a bucket and a half of popcorn (which predictably results in severe tummy ache for days
and I still can't move my tongue properly. Also, I've drank about four gallons
of liquid since and still hadn't had a need to pee. But it was worth it.).
I
just thought it would be better. It’s been a while since I saw a movie in such
a mess.
Things that
disappointed me:
-
First thing that pissed me off was that the local
theater suddenly charged twice the prize for the tickets, as it was supposed to
be a long movie. It’s the first time I hear of this and it’s not the only long
movie. But since kids come see it and kids drag parents along, this is an
excellent opportunity to milk not 22 but 44 bucks for a fucking film from a family.
-
I’m SOOOOO gorram over trilogies. Seriously, could you
PLEASE stop stretching single features into infinity?! NOBODY wants to watch another
eleven hours of a story that originated in a really cute and short adventure
book. Granted nobody will ever try to do Sillmarillion nor any of Hurin’s kids
or any other of the 257 or so books JRR wrote, plus HIS kids, but when I went in, I really
wanted to see Beorn and how the company escapes Mirkwood in barrels and how
somewhere over the hill five armies meet. I’ve already seen the hyper-epic Lord
of The Rings, which comes from a 4000 page book. What was this, a fucking echo?
-
No, seriously,
was this a fucking echo? Is it just me or did they re-use scenes from the LOTR
about two dozen times?? Gandalf growing in anger in BagEnd? Gandalf whispering
to a moth for help? Eagles coming to rescue good guys in slow motion? Going up
a tricky mountain in storm? Running around in a rocky maze with a glowing
sword? Rohan scenery/orc running. Most of Gandalf’s text. Galadriel’s hair.
Seriously, I COULD go on.Those were, like the SAME takes.
-
There were supposed to be 13 dwarves. I only remember
three. There was one with dark hair who looked distinctly human and he’s shown
more than any of the other, bar the leader, combined. There wasn’t a close-up
of the one with the axe in his head ONCE. I know, because I was waiting for it.
I know the costumography for the dwarves was extremely elaborate and I wanted
to see it. All I saw here was that guy’s big black eyes and a lot of colorful
beards.
-
Although casting was wonderful, most of the close-ups
on lead characters consisted of a) confused Bilbo b) very old Gandalf who
didn’t really seem to know where he was most of the time, c) dramatically lit
one-brow-look, shot from above of Thorin, dangerous, but tragic hottin with gray highlights.. and d) really
pretty wide angle landscape. Really pretty.
-
I fucking hate having to wait another eon to see what
they will copy from LOTR next. I already know the story, I’ve read the book
four million times.
-
At least all the giggling girls and most gay men won’t
have to wait to see what Legolas’ dad looks like. Although I expected someone a
lot more good looking, I am glad they cast and dressed up an anemic drag queen.
He is, after all, supposed to be a sleazy villain. In my mind, and probably in
Tolkien’s, though, he was this really hot woods creature, potent in life and
limb, athletic, energetic, arrogant and with a crown of thing ripped out from
the ground. Certainly someone you don’t regret being put in chains by. What we
got was the third runner up for the role of Legolas, if only he wasn’t older,
more boring and uglier.
-
There was something odd with the camera or the way it
was shot or something, that doesn’t agree with me. Like there was too much of
everything and where there was supposed to be action, I could hardly tell who
was who and what was going on. Usually I just stuck to the good old rule of
running through dungeons or though dragons: follow the pointy hat.
-
It felt like most of the dialogue was delivered rather
pompously. Like they were rehearsing an Oscar speech or something.
-
Things
I really liked:
-
Radagast the Brown. In love! Well, not me personally,
but I am SO dialing his number and putting the phone to Granny Weatherwax’s ear
and jumping away … He was perfect. And I don’t even think his story line is
important in any way.
-
Did you know bunnies actually do that, before they
change? Not actually thump/drum the ground with their foot in alarm, but they
actually pump up their blood-flow. Like a spasm. And then -zaaap--! Those
bunnies had Gangnam!
-
Thorin. Richard Armitage played him beautifully. I’ve
never had any particular desire to fuck a dwarf in my stories, but I’ll expand
my list of ‘dos’ in close future. Also, most of his close-ups and slow-motions
are really impressive.
-
The pale orc. Whatshisface. Ironhand. Whatever. Definitely writing a story about
fucking him. Dunno, I’m just into orcs lately. Must be those neck-to-shoulder
muscles.
-
Bilbo. But if I say anything nice about Martin
Freeman, people will think he’s paying me. That man is truly a pleasure to
watch on-screen. He was perfect as Arthur Dent, he was perfect as a soft-porn
actor in Love, actually, great as Watson, he is simply adorable.
-
Scenery, as said before.
-
Costumes.
-
Men singing. Lately a turn-on. Not elves, though. I
loved the scene in which the deaf old dwarf stuffs cloth into his hearing
device to skip the elfish recital during diner.
-
Also, we get to see/hear more of Figwit. Everyone
wants to have BDSM sex with Figwit. That cutsie has more smut fanfic in the
Library Of Moria than all of Fellowship.
-
No Aragorn. Thank the fucking Gods. I didn’t need to
see old Bilbo or young Frodo again either. That was a different move, people!!
I like to remember those chars as they were.
-
A certain array of characters even I wouldn’t bed.
Which is saying something in the direction of imagination of the Jackson ensemble.Or did Del Toro come up with the gruesome goblin king? (Hah. That reminds me of David Bowie. Not the gruesome part.)
-
The snoring moths.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment